Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA


Solution and grading rubric:
- p:
Discusses/demonstrates that:- in case (a), the fraction of unpolarized light that passes through a polarizer (regardless of its transmission angle) is (1/2); and
- for case (b), the fraction of polarized light that passes through a polarizer is given by Malus' law: cos2(90° − θ), where the angle of interest is between the horizontally polarization of the incident light and the transmission angle of the polarizer; and
- for the fraction transmitted in case (b) to equal the fraction transmitted in case (a), sets cos2(90° − θ) = (1/2), and thus θ = 45°.
- r:
As (p), but argument indirectly, weakly, or only by definition supports the statement to be proven, or has minor inconsistencies or loopholes. - t:
Nearly correct, but argument has conceptual errors, or is incomplete. At least understands what happens in case (a), and has some systematic approach to match this fraction for case (b). - v:
Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. Some garbled attempt at applying the properties of light, polarizers, and polarization. - x:
Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. No clear attempt at applying the properties of light, polarizers, and polarization. - y:
Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank. - z:
Blank.
Sections 30882, 30883
Exam code: midterm01Ft6G
p: 16 students
r: 2 students
t: 14 students
v: 10 students
x: 0 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students
A sample "p" response (from student 7843):

No comments:
Post a Comment