20131031

Astronomy quiz archive: sun/spectra/star properties

Astronomy 210 Quiz 5, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Section 70158, version 1
Exam code: quiz05GieH


Section 70158
0- 8.0 : ***** [low = 4.0]
8.5-16.0 : *******
16.5-24.0 : ************** [mean = 23.0 +/- 9.6]
24.5-32.0 : *************
32.5-40.0 : ********* [high = 40]


Section 70160, version 1
Exam code: quiz05Nuhl


Section 70160
0- 8.0 : * [low = 7.5]
8.5-16.0 : ****
16.5-24.0 : ********* [mean = 24.0 +/- 7.3]
24.5-32.0 : ******
32.5-40.0 : ******* [high = 33]

Physics quiz archive: energy conservation, momentum conservation

Physics 205A Quiz 4, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
Sections 70854, 70855, 73320, version 1
Exam code: quiz04iSs5



Sections 70854, 70855, 73320 results
0- 6 :   ** [low = 6]
7-12 :   ***********
13-18 :   ************************* [mean = 18.6 +/- 6.0]
19-24 :   ******************
25-30 :   ********** [high = 30]

20131025

GIF animation: expansion of ascending balloon

"eoss-139 Balloon Expansion"
EOSS (Richard1984)
http://youtu.be/9irgdAX1BFo

GIF animation: distant star versus nearby star parallax

Distant star, smaller parallax angle.

Nearby star, larger parallax angle.

GIF animation screen captures from "Parallax/Solar System Modeler" http://www.astro.washington.edu/labs/parallax/solar.html (original link, defunct) http://www.uwlax.edu/faculty/sallmen/phy160/labs/lab3_files/uwash_files/solar.html (Astronomy Department, University of Washington)

GIF animations: blue smoke versus black smoke

"Slow-Motion Cigarette Smoke on a Black Screen Free Download! VFX"
FreeVFX4U
youtu.be/R7mI5b0xj6U

"Oil fire smoke billowing in Jaipur"
WildFilmsIndia
youtu.be/nBiw6GTqKjg

20131020

Physics midterm problem: range of possible static friction coefficient values

Physics 205A Midterm 1, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Cf. Giambattista/Richardson/Richardson, Physics, 2/e, Problem 4.63

A force of 10.0 N pushes on 5.0 kg crate that is initially stationary, and as a result it becomes unstuck and begins to slide. When the 2.0 kg book is stacked on top of the crate, a force of 10.0 N pushes on the crate, and both book and crate remain motionless. Determine a plausible numerical value for the coefficient of static friction µs for the crate and the floor. Show your work and explain your reasoning using a free-body diagram, the properties of forces, and Newton's laws.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Correct. Draws free-body diagrams and applies Newton's laws and definitions of maximum static friction forces. For the crate, the applied force of 10.0 N must be just at or above the maximum static friction force of µs⋅(49 N), which yields a maximum value of 0.20 for µs. For the book stacked on the crate, the applied force of 10.0 N must be below the maximum static friction force of µs⋅(68 N), which yields a minimum value of 0.15 for µs. Thus the static coefficient of friction µs between the crater and floor must have some specific value between 0.15 and 0.20. May instead have determined that µs = 0.20 for the critical case of the applied force just being able to unstick the crate, and demonstrates that this µs value would result in a maximum static friction force of 14 N for the book on crate, such that it would remain stationary; or determined that µs = 0.15 for the critical case of the applied force just being able to unstick the book on crate, and demonstrates that this µs value would result in a maximum static friction force of 7.4 N for the crate, such that it would become unstuck.
  • r:
    Nearly correct, but includes minor math errors. Determines bounding values for µs (0.15, 0.20), but does not explicitly interpret µs must be some value between 0.15 and 0.20.
  • t:
    Nearly correct, but approach has conceptual errors, and/or major/compounded math errors. Has free-body diagram and methodical application of Newton's laws to determine one of the boundary values of µs from one of the two cases, but does not explicitly demonstrate that it would apply to the other case.
  • v:
    Implementation of right ideas, but in an inconsistent, incomplete, or unorganized manner. Free-body diagram identifies most forces and their directions, with some attempt at applying Newton's laws.
  • x:
    Implementation of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Garbled/incomplete free-body diagram with little to no application of Newton's laws, etc.
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Grading distribution:
Sections 70854, 70855, 73320
Exam code: midterm01p0To
p: 18 students
r: 9 students
t: 9 students
v: 33 students
x: 4 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 0825), finding the range of possible µs values:

Another sample "p" response (from student 0494), demonstrating that the lowest possible µs value would work in both cases:

20131018

Astronomy quiz archive: solar system

Astronomy 210 Quiz 4, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Section 70160, version 1
Exam code: quiz04bBu8


Section 70160
0- 8.0 :   * [low = 4.5]
8.5-16.0 :   *****
16.5-24.0 :   ********** [mean = 22.0 +/- 7.8]
24.5-32.0 :   ********
32.5-40.0 :   ** [high = 40.0]

20131012

Astronomy midterm question: "dark" run illuminated by waning gibbous moon?

Astronomy 210 Midterm 1, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

The following was posted on Facebook[*]:
Brandy V.: So, this...was my first "dark" run with [my dog] Lilly in tow. She was easy to watch...with the [light from the waning gibbous] moon.
Discuss a specific plausible range of times for this person's first "dark" run with her dog. Support your answer using a diagram showing the positions of the sun, the moon, Earth, and an observer on Earth.

[*] Posted September 4, 2012, facebook.com.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Correct. The waning gibbous moon is highest overhead at 3:00 AM, and would have risen six hours before at 9:00 PM, and set six hours later at 9:00 AM. For the skies to be still be dark for Brandy V.'s run would mean any time between 9:00 PM and just before sunrise at 6:00 AM. Complete diagram and reasoning.
  • r:
    Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors.
  • t:
    Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors. May have plausible times for waxing gibbous or waning crescent "dark" run.
  • v:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. Diagram and discussion problematic.
  • x:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Misconceptions or non-relevant concepts: moon phases created by Earth's shadow, diagrams with the moon orbiting the sun, etc.
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Grading distribution:
Section 70158
Exam code: midterm1s73W
p: 44 students
r: 0 students
t: 3 students
v: 1 student
x: 2 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

Section 70160
Exam code: midterm1N1t3
p: 20 students
r: 0 students
t: 6 students
v: 0 students
x: 3 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 0304):
Another sample "p" response (from student 3374):

Astronomy midterm question: telescope advantage comparison

Astronomy 210 Midterm 1, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

The primary mirror diameters and tube lengths of two different telescopes are measured, and their telescope powers are discussed by two astronomy students. Both telescopes use the same eyepieces.
Student 1: The Newtonian reflector is better at producing images with finer details.
Student 2: The Schmidt-Cassegrain reflector is better at looking at faint objects.
Discuss which of these students you disagree with, and why. Support your answer using the properties of telescopes and telescope powers.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Discusses how diameter of primary mirror determines both light-gathering power and resolving power, such that a larger diameter mirror of the Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope would result in making fainter objects brighter, and allowing finer details to be seen, thus the first student's statement is incorrect.
  • r:
    Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors.
  • t: Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors.
  • v:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. Discussion of telescope parameters and telescope powers is garbled.
  • x:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Does not discuss connection between telescope parameters and telescope powers.
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Grading distribution:
Section 70158
Exam code: midterm1s73W
p: 19 students
r: 7 students
t: 12 students
v: 8 students
x: 4 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

Section 70160
Exam code: midterm1N1t3
p: 11 students
r: 1 student
t: 11 students
v: 5 students
x: 1 student
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 4846):
Another sample "p" response (from student 6683):

20131007

Astronomy quiz archive: telescopes

Astronomy 210 Quiz 3, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Section 70158, version 1
Exam code: quiz03sF0x

Section 70158
0- 8.0 : ** [low = 5.5]
8.5-16.0 : ****
16.5-24.0 : **************
24.5-32.0 : ************* [mean = 24.9 +/- 7.9]
32.5-40.0 : ******** [high = 40.0]


Section 70160, version 1
Exam code: quiz03n1n6

Section 70160
0- 8.0 : **** [low = 8.0]
8.5-16.0 : *****
16.5-24.0 : ******* [mean = 21.7 +/- 10.4]
24.5-32.0 : *******
32.5-40.0 : ******** [high = 40.0]

20131003

Astronomy quiz archive: eclipses/history of astronomy

Astronomy 210 Quiz 2, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Section 70158, version 1
Exam code: quiz02sNi7

Section 70158
0- 8.0 : **** [low = 0.0]
8.5-16.0 : *************
16.5-24.0 : *********** [mean = 21.4 +/- 9.8]
24.5-32.0 : *************
32.5-40.0 : ***** [high = 40.0]


Section 70160, version 1
Exam code: quiz02nf0X

Section 70160
0- 8.0 : * [low = 4.0]
8.5-16.0 : *********
16.5-24.0 : ****** [mean = 23.3 +/- 9.8]
24.5-32.0 : ****
32.5-40.0 : ******** [high = 40.0]

Physics quiz archive: vectors, projectile motion, forces

Physics 205A Quiz 3, fall semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
Sections 70854, 70855, 73320, version 1
Exam code: quiz03eL3v


Sections 70854, 70855, 73320 results
0- 6 : ** [low = 6]
7-12 : ********************
13-18 : *************************** [mean = 16.6 +/- 5.2]
19-24 : ****************
25-30 : ***** [high = 27]