Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61c6b/61c6b9fba466d43950b3ad860871547f6c67e6fe" alt=""
Solution and grading rubric:
- p:
Correct. Recognizes that the diagram is invalid by discussing:- this was originally an electron capture process that has been rotated, but the proton path is reversed; or
- the "one line in, one line out" vertex rule is violated; or
- charge conservation is violated (net negative charge of electron and antineutrino in does not equal the net positive charge of neutron and proton out).
- r:
As (p), but argument indirectly, weakly, or only by definition supports the statement to be proven, or has minor inconsistencies or loopholes. - t:
Nearly correct, but argument has conceptual errors, or is incomplete. - v:
Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. Some garbled attempt at applying properties of Feynman diagrams. - x:
Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. - y:
Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank. - z:
Blank.
Sections 30882, 30883
Exam code: finalm4u1
p: 26 students
r: 7 students
t: 2 students
v: 3 students
x: 1 student
y: 0 students
z: 0 students
A sample "p" response (from student 2691):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c080/5c0804f13e1c63d45332aa13b21a50bc5d218278" alt=""
Another sample "p" response (from student 3158):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c8a/f5c8a25e0bd8b71fc7f859262097470cf781862b" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment