Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

[*] Daniel Bear Hunley, blog.rei.com/social/hand-lettering-art-mobile-wallpaper-beauty-go/.
Solution and grading rubric:
- p:
Correct. The waning crescent moon (less than the left half of the moon is lit up) is highest overhead at 9:00 AM, and would have risen six hours before at 3:00 AM, such that it would be impossible to see at midnight. (May identify the moon as third quarter (highest overhead at 6:00 AM, which would rise at midnight), and may argue that the moon is either visible or not visible at midnight.) Complete diagram and reasoning. - r:
Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors. Diagram and/or explanation has minor errors. - t:
Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors. Problems with either diagram or discussion. - v:
Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. Diagram and discussion problematic. - x:
Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. - y:
Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank. - z:
Blank.
Section 30674
Exam code: midterm01nR31
p: 23 students
r: 3 student
t: 6 students
v: 5 students
x: 1 student
y: 0 students
z: 0 students
A sample "p" response (from student 9507), arguing why this waning crescent moon picture would not be possible:

A sample "p" response (from student 7606), arguing why this third quarter moon picture could be possible:

A sample "p" response (from student 4294), discussing the impossibility of both third quarter and waning crescent moon interpretations of this photo:

No comments:
Post a Comment