Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3be5/e3be5f6fb96636a5f349ad7efc746858a064f219" alt=""
Solution and grading rubric:
- p:
Correct. Discusses (1) how the second Feynman diagram violates the in-out path vertex rule, and/or (2) draws a corrected Feynman diagram for an antineutrino and proton respectively turning into a positron and neutron after the interaction. - r:
As (p), but argument indirectly, weakly, or only by definition supports the statement to be proven, or has minor inconsistencies or loopholes. - t:
Nearly correct, but argument has conceptual errors, or is incomplete. - v:
Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. - x:
Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. - y:
Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank. - z:
Blank.
Sections 30882
Exam code: finalpL3x
p: 16 students
r: 1 student
t: 5 students
v: 3 students
x: 2 students
y: 1 student
z: 2 students
A sample "p" response (from student 1408):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6508/b6508778cd8aa818aa7089532f498dbcd754c80f" alt=""
A sample "x" response (from student 8325), with at least some demonstration of understanding charge flow conservation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bab60/bab60f1617d3b781e05afba943bee7919a02686e" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment