Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/352a4/352a4ec40d9bc3036956e7fe04bf5a2de800d699" alt=""
(Photo credit: Untitled, Zara Evans, November 19, 2006, http://www.flickr.com/photos/zara/301724221/).
Solution and grading rubric:
- p = 20/20:
Correct. Pluto already satisfies the first two IAU classification requirements (orbits the sun, and has spherical shape), but does not satisfy the third requirement, as Pluto does not clear/dominate its orbit. If this rule were eliminated, then Pluto would again become a planet. - r = 16/20:
Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors. Instead of eliminating the third IAU requirement, argues that Pluto should instead satisfy it if were to somehow clear/domintate its orbit. - t = 12/20:
Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors. Problematic discussion, but at least understands IAU classification scheme. - v = 8/20:
Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. Only partial understanding of IAU requirements. - x = 4/20:
Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Discussion of criteria unrelated to the IAU requirements. - y = 2/20:
Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank. - z = 0/20:
Blank.
Section 70160
p: 30 students
r: 5 students
t: 3 students
v: 2 students
x: 0 students
y: 1 student
z: 0 students
Section 70158
p: 40 students
r: 0 students
t: 0 students
v: 4 students
x: 1 student
y: 0 students
z: 2 students
A sample "p" response (from student 8260):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52f4/c52f4dc77d626a7a9a477874f3cf06af447139cb" alt=""
Another sample "p" response (from student 8624), with an appeal to the head of Abraham Lincoln:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/285fb/285fb3ff9319c2f82c625bc9f477eea88c0a7f7c" alt=""
A sample "r" response (from student 7094), where it would be easier to change Pluto's orbit than to change the IAU rules?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c717/6c7172fd75d690fc7c6878a54c3fad1ccf1ace97" alt=""
A sample "v" response (from student ):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3b37/a3b37158950f5063700bba6563cb29c17d380ac6" alt=""
Another sample "v" response (from student 2857):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60304/60304bb9f9e48a0b0a41c328873eb43ec6de1593" alt=""
A speculative "x" response (from student 2388):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/966f5/966f5c82586667a5fb5cd8164b2f3e4bf642ca2c" alt=""
Cf. a similar question (Cuesta College, Spring 2009) regarding Pluto's status in an earlier post:
Astronomy final exam question: Pluto not a planet?.
2 comments:
For more on why the IAU definition makes no sense and support for Pluto being recognized as a planet, visit my Pluto Blog at http://laurele.livejournal.com
Could you provide a direct link to the specific blog post(s), or at least provide a summary? It would be a bit much for students to have to dig through every entry. Regards.
Post a Comment