Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
Cf. Giambattista/Richardson/Richardson, Physics, 2/e, Conceptual Question 6.13
(Adapted from Eric Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User's Manual, Prentice Hall, 1997, p. 63.)
[10 points.] Consider two slides that start at the same height and end at the same lower height. Both slides have negligible friction, and neglect drag. Which slide would a Physics 205A student have the faster speed at the bottom, starting from rest? Explain your reasoning by using the properties of energy conservation.
Solution and grading rubric:
- p = 10/10:
Correct. Uses energy conservation to show that the student will have
the same speed at the bottom of either slide. - r = 8/10:
As (p), but argument indirectly, weakly, or only by definition supports the statement to be proven, or has minor inconsistencies or loopholes. - t = 6/10:
Nearly correct, but argument has conceptual errors, or is incomplete. At least has methodical application of energy conservation. - v = 4/10:
Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. - x = 2/10:
Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Does not use energy conservation at all. - y = 1/10:
Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank. - z = 0/10:
Blank.
Grading distribution:
Sections 30880, 30881
p: 13 students
r: 6 students
t: 2 students
v: 5 students
x: 13 students
y: 0 students
z: 1 student
A sample of a "p" response (from student 0008):
Another sample "p" response (from student 0915):
One last sample "p" response (from student 0915), using perhaps much too many equations to make a simple point:
No comments:
Post a Comment