20090410

Physics quiz question: two- versus four-bladed fan

Physics 205A Quiz 5, spring semester 2009
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Cf. Giambattista/Richardson/Richardson, Physics, 2/e, Problem 8.5

(Version 1)
[3.0 points.] Four uniform rods with identical masses, and equal lengths are arranged as a long two-bladed fan, or as a shorter four-bladed fan, as shown at right. Which fan blade arrangement has the largest rotational inertia?
(A) The two-bladed fan.
(B) The four-bladed fan.
(C) (There is a tie.)
(D) (Not enough information is given to determine this.)

Correct answer: (A)

For a thin, uniform rod of mass M and length L, students were given that the rotational inertia about an axis through its center, perpendicular to the length is given by Icenter = (1/12)·M·L2; while the rotational inertia about an axis at one end, perpendicular to the length is given by Iend = (1/3)·M·L2.

If each individual rod segment has mass m and length l, then the rotational inertia of the two-bladed fan is:

Itwo-blade = 2·Iend (where M = 2·m, L = 2·l) = 2·(1/3)·(2·m)·(2·l)2 = (16/3)·m·l2.

This is larger than the rotational inertia of the four-bladed fan:

Ifour-blade = 4·Iend (where M = m, L = l) = 4·(1/3)·m·l2 = (4/3)·m·l2.

(The four-bladed fan rotational inertia could also be derived from:

Ifour-blade = 2·Icenter (where M = 2·m, L = 2·l) = 2·(1/12)·(2·m)·(2·l)2 = (4/3)·m·l2.)

Student responses
Sections 30880, 30881
(A) : 13 students
(B) : 1 student
(C) : 6 students
(D) : 0 students

(Version 2)
[3.0 points.] Four uniform rods with identical masses, and equal lengths are arranged as a long two-bladed fan, or as a shorter four-bladed fan, as shown at right. Which fan blade arrangement has the smallest rotational inertia?
(A) The two-bladed fan.
(B) The four-bladed fan.
(C) (There is a tie.)
(D) (Not enough information is given to determine this.)

Correct answer: (B)

Student responses
Sections 30880, 30881
(A) : 5 students
(B) : 12 students
(C) : 3 students
(D) : 0 students

"Difficulty level": 64%
Discrimination index (Aubrecht & Aubrecht, 1983): 0.29

No comments: