data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cedbf/cedbf68c1cf8a12c74a827bb11fb6c900d2815f6" alt=""
Anonymous, Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
But apparently cheap tricks like this works...on some level.
Astronomy and physics education research and comments, field-tested think-pair-share (peer instruction) clicker questions, flashcard questions, in-class activities (lecture-tutorials), current events questions, backwards faded scaffolding laboratories, Hake gains, field-tested multiple-choice and essay exam questions, indices of discrimination, presentation slides, photos, ephemerae, astronomy in the marketplace, unrelated random sketches and minutiae.
The following table lists the criteria for posted in response to a topic on the discussion forum. The posted response should be with complete sentences and correct grammar. These will be graded according to the following:This rubric is a good example of a subtractive scale, where students understand that they will receive a certain grade for--Jean Hurrle, Kankakee River Valley Forest Preserve District
- 90-100: A-Level participation
- The conclusion or opinion is relevant to the discussion topic.
- The answer is insightful & synthesizes basic concepts.
- You have stated reasons and evidence to support your conclusion or opinion.
- The answer and supporting evidence is clearly stated.
- 80-89: B–Level participation
Same as A-Level participation, except that:
- The answer is notably lacking one of the items listed for an A level response.
- 70-79: C–Level participation
Same as B–Level participation, except that:
- The answer is notably lacking two of the items listed for A-Level response.
- 60-69: D-Level participation
Same as C–Level participation, except that:
- The answer is notably lacking three of the items listed for A- Level response.
- 59 and below: F–level participation
- Failure to turn in the work
...Is telling your students "one blaze of effort at the end is all you really need to pass a college class" a message we should be sending? Especially if these will be future teachers? My finals are worth no more than any other test. The good news is students get to drop a test. So my best students never take the final.In Astronomy 10 (introductory astronomy, general education) at Cuesta College, the Final Exam is weighted no more than the midterms (but no exams are dropped), and a single exam (75 points) is worth less than a letter grade jump (100 points). This means that students are highly motivated to continuously keep up with the material during the semester as opposed to the "blaze of effort at the end," as their letter grade will nearly be pre-determined by the end of the semester, as the Final Exam can only raise their letter grade if they reasonably close to a cut-off.
-- Liam McDaid, Sacramento City College
Astronomy 10 Spring Semester 2007 section 4136
N = 36
<initial%> = ??% +/- ??%
<final%> = 50% +/- 16%
<g> = 0.??
Astronomy 10 Spring Semester 2007 section 5076
N = 32
<initial%> = 29% +/- 9%
<final%> = 49% +/- 15%
<g> = 0.29
Astronomy 10 Fall Semester 2006 section 1080
N = 61
<initial%> = 29% +/- 14%
<final%> = 49% +/- 14%
<g> = 0.29
Astronomy 10 Spring Semester 2006 section 5060
N = 47
<initial%> = 28% +/- 12%
<final%> = 50% +/- 11%
<g> = 0.32
Physics 7B Summer Session II 2002 sections 21-23
N = 76
<initial%> = 30% +/- 13%
<final%> = 41% +/- 18%
<g> = 0.16
"High-g" courses: <g> >= 0.7
"Medium-g" courses: 0.7 > <g> >= 0.3
"Low-g" courses: 0.3 > <g>
Interactive engagement courses (48 courses):
<g> = 0.48 +/- 0.14
Traditional courses (14 courses):
<g> = 0.23 +/- 0.04
"...promote conceptual understanding through interactive engagement of students in heads-on (always) and hands-on (usually) activities which yield immediate feedback through discussion with peers and/or instructors."In contrast, traditional courses:
"...make little or no use of IE methods, relying primarily on passive-student lectures, recipe labs, and algorithmic-problem exams."The FCI was administered to Physics 8A (first-semester of calculus-based physics sequence) students at Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA during the first week of instruction, then on the last week of instruction. The results below are class averages for the initial and final FCI scores (given as percentages, with standard deviations), as well as the Hake normalized gain <g>:
Physics 8A Spring Semester 2007 sections 4909-4911
N = 27
<initial%> = 41% +/- 17%
<final%> = 49% +/- 20%
<g> = 0.14
Physics 8A Fall Semester 2006 sections 0910-0912
N = 36
<initial%> = 42% +/- 21%
<final%> = 51% +/- 18%
<g> = 0.16
Physics 8A Spring Semester 2006 sections 4888-4893
N = 72
<initial%> = 44% +/- 21%
<final%> = 53% +/- 20%
<g> = 0.15