20090611

Physics final exam question: icy lake versus hot teapot

Physics 205A Final Exam, Spring Semester 2009
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Cf. Giambattista/Richardson/Richardson, Physics, 2/e, Conceptual Question 14.20

[10 points.] Which possesses more total internal energy, the water within a large, partially ice-covered lake in winter, or a 6-cup teapot filled with hot tea? Explain using the properties of heat and internal energy?

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p = 10/10:
    Correct. At absolute zero (0 kelvins), there is zero total internal energy. It will take much more heat to bring a frozen lake from absolute zero to partially frozen 273 K, than it would to bring a teapot of ice from absolute zero to near/at 373 K, as mass predominates over the delta(T) factors.
  • r = 8/10:
    As (p), but argument indirectly, weakly, or only by definition supports the statement to be proven, or has minor inconsistencies or loopholes.
  • t = 6/10:
    Nearly correct, but argument has conceptual errors, or is incomplete. Recognizes mass and delta(T) factors are relevant, but chooses delta(T) as the determinant factor.
  • v = 4/10:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner.
  • x = 2/10:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit.
  • y = 1/10:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z = 0/10:
    Blank.

Grading distribution:
Sections 30880, 30881
p: 12 students
r: 12 students
t: 11 students
v: 3 students
x: 0 students
y: 0 students
z: 1 student

A sample of a "p" response (from student 0402):

Another sample of a "p" response (from student 1830), also taking into consideration the heat put in starting from absolute zero as the amount of internal energy present:

Another sample of a "p" response (from student 1985), using a heat exchange argument between these two systems:

No comments: