20151130

Online reading assignment: internal energy conservation

Physics 205A, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Students have a bi-weekly online reading assignment (hosted by SurveyMonkey.com), where they answer questions based on reading their textbook, material covered in previous lectures, opinion questions, and/or asking (anonymous) questions or making (anonymous) comments. Full credit is given for completing the online reading assignment before next week's lecture, regardless if whether their answers are correct/incorrect. Selected results/questions/comments are addressed by the instructor at the start of the following lecture.

The following questions were asked on reading textbook chapters and previewing a presentation on internal energy conservation.


Selected/edited responses are given below.

Describe what you understand from the assigned textbook reading or presentation preview. Your description (2-3 sentences) should specifically demonstrate your level of understanding.
"Internal thermal energy is not concerned with the macroscopic movement or rotation of an object, rather, the microscopic motion of the individual atoms and molecules within an object. Looks like we will be able to understand the physics of how objects heat up internally due to separate and internal forces of energy."

"Energy cannot be created or destroyed, thus the energy lost by a system (-Q) is equal to the energy gained by its surroundings (+Q), and vice-versa. When that energy is being transferred between objects of different temperatures it is called 'heat.' Heat comes from the internal energy of a substance, which is the sum of molecular energies, including kinetic and potential molecular energies. When bonds are broken within a substance its internal energy increases, and when bonds are formed its internal energy decreases. So for a particular substance, the gas form has more energy than the liquid form, which has more energy than the solid form."

"If there is no energy transferred into or out of the thermal internal energy of a system, then it is effectively thermally isolated from the environment, and the heat exchanged between the system and the external environment is zero. Also, if the thermal internal energy of a system increases, its temperature increases, and thus external heat from the environment is positive, being added into the system. In contrast, if the thermal internal energy of a system decreases, its temperature decreases, and thus external heat from the environment is negative, being removed from the system."

"Thermal internal energy is the measurement of movement of a systems individual molecules. This measurement relies on the objects mass, specific heat capacity and changes in temperature. The lower thermal internal energy the lower the temperature and vice versa. We are more concerned with changes in thermal internal energy rather than measuring amounts. Bond internal energy is much like gravitational potential energy in that it can store energy. Heat is the transfer of internal energy on a microscopic scale. Objects cool when hear is lost. Thermal equilibrium is reached when two objects become the same temperature and flow stops."

"The internal energy of a system is the total energy of all of the molecules in the system except for the macroscopic kinetic energy."

"I am familiar with using Etherm equation from chemistry."

"The idea that "heat: only refers to the energy actually in transit form hot to cold. Something cannot contain heat just internal energy the heat is the energy moving form hot to cold."

"There does not exist 'cold,' but only 'lack of heat' helps with understanding this topic."

"During vaporization, bonds are broken and the bond internal energy decreases. Similarly, during the reverse processes bonds are formed and bond internal energy decreases."

"We should be careful to not confuse this topic with the thermodynamics we learn in chemistry. Also, the total thermal internal energy of an object's atomic and molecular motion depends on its mass (m) and its temperature T in Kelvins, and has units of joules (J), not calories or kilocalories like in chemistry class. We are going to look at the initial-to-final changes in the internal energies of systems."

Describe what you found confusing from the assigned textbook reading or presentation preview. Your description (2-3 sentences) should specifically identify the concept(s) that you do not understand.
"We covered thermodynamics extensively in my chemistry class earlier this semester, so most of the material in these sections was familiar. I'd like to see some applications of the transfer/balance equation, though."

"I got confused while I was reading about bond internal energy when you mentioned about atoms and molecules need to get closer in order to connect."

"The only thing that I found a little confusing was the the transfer balance equation and exactly what it meant. Everything else made sense to me, though."

"Almost everything."

"I could use more practice with the transfer balance equation."

"I did not have anything confusing with the reading assignment. But I did have trouble applying those concepts to the examples."

Two objects that are brought into contact with each other will reach thermal equilibrium when they have the same:
internal energy.   ************* [13]
temperature.   *********************** [23]
(Both of the above choices.)   ************ [12]
(Neither of the above choices.)   [0]
(Unsure/lost/guessing/help!)   ** [2]

Raw seafood is placed on a block of salt that has already been heated up. The energy contained in the high-temperature block of salt is then transferred to the seafood, cooking it. While it is being cooked, the internal thermal energy of the seafood __________, while the thermal internal energy of the salt block __________.
increases; decreases.   ********************************************* [45]
decreases; increases.   [0]
does not change; does not change.   * [1]
(Unsure/lost/guessing/help!)   **** [4]

For the seafood cooking on the salt block (ignoring heat transfers with the environment), the object that experienced the greatest amount of change (increase or decrease) in thermal internal energy was the:
seafood.   ******** [13]
salt block.   *** [3]
(There is a tie.)   ****************************** [30]
(Unsure/lost/guessing/help!)   **** [4]

Frozen meat is placed in a water bath, in order to defrost it. At the very start of this defrosting process (where the frozen meat just begins to warm up from its below-freezing temperature, and the ice crystals inside have not yet reached the melting point), the internal thermal energy of the meat __________, while the thermal internal energy of the water __________.
increases; decreases.   ******************************** [32]
decreases; increases.   ******* [7]
does not change; does not change.   ****** [5]
(Unsure/lost/guessing/help!)   ****** [6]

For the frozen meat in the water bath (ignoring heat transfers with the environment), the object that experienced the greatest amount of change (increase or decrease) in thermal internal energy was the:
frozen meat.   ***** [5]
water bath.   ******** [8]
(There is a tie.)   ******************************* [31]
(Unsure/lost/guessing/help!)   ****** [6]

A shot of whiskey is mixed with a pint of beer to make a boilermaker. Assuming that the whiskey and beer have approximately the same temperature before they are mixed together, the internal thermal energy of the whiskey __________, while the thermal internal energy of the beer __________.
increases; decreases.   *** [3]
decreases; increases.   ** [2]
does not change; does not change.   **************************************** [40]
(Unsure/lost/guessing/help!)   ***** [5]

For the shot of whiskey being mixed with the pint of beer (ignoring heat transfers with the environment), the object that experienced the greatest amount of change (increase or decrease) in thermal internal energy was the:
shot of whiskey.   ** [2]
pint of beer.   ** [2]
(There is a tie.)   *************************************** [39]
(Unsure/lost/guessing/help!)   ******* [7]

Ask the instructor an anonymous question, or make a comment. Selected questions/comments may be discussed in class.
"Can we conduct an experiment with boilermakers in class?" (Already did that, after finishing grading your midterms.)

"How is internal thermal energy related to temperature?" (The same way translational kinetic energy is related to speed. And gravitational potential energy is related to height. These are all types of energies, each of which changes when a certain observable parameter (temperature, speed, height) changes.)

"How do we know what the specific heat is for stuff? Is there an equation for 'c' that we are supposed to know? Or would that value be given/have to solve for in most equations regarding internal thermal energy." (Generally specific heat values for different materials are given to you, unless you need to solve for it. Treat it like any other property of a material that you can look up, or have to solve for.)

"The only part I find confusing, is when you asked which object experienced the greatest amount of change (increase or decrease) in thermal energy, I said that they were all tied because I believe that whatever one object loses, the other one should pick it up--but I believe I am getting confused about this part." (Assuming that the objects that are interacting are isolated from the environment, then you are correct.)

"Do you enjoy teaching?" (Yes. Enough to teach sixty more semesters of physics.)

"What were we supposed to read?" (#smh.)

20151128

Astronomy midterm question: Star Wars "That's no moon..." analysis

Astronomy 210 Midterm 2, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

In the movie Star Wars (20th Century Fox, 1977), the Death Star was a giant spherical traveling space station that was initially mistaken as a "small moon." In the webcomic panel at right[*] it is further argued that the Death Star is "too small to be a moon." Discuss why the Death Star cannot be considered a moon, despite its small size. Explain using the International Astronomical Union classification scheme.

[*] Randall Munroe, "Small Moon," xkcd.com/1458/.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Correct. Of the three IAU requirements (orbits the sun directly, has a rounded shape, cleared/dominates its orbit), if an object does not orbit the sun (or presumably any star) directly, but orbits a planet, then it is classified as a moon/satellite. Since the Death Star can travel through space, then it would not be a moon/satellite while it is not in orbit around a planet.
  • r:
    Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors. May argue that the Death Star is not a moon because it does not orbit the sun (when the IAU classification scheme asks whether the object directly orbits the sun, or is in orbit around another object such as a planet), but understands the importance of the first classification question.
  • t:
    Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors. May also involve the shape of the Death Star and/or its ability to gravitationally dominate other objects as important, other than its orbiting another object in orbit around the sun (or any star).
  • v:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. Discussion only tangentially related to the IAU classification scheme.
  • x:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Discussion unrelated to the IAU classification scheme.
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Grading distribution:
Section 70160
Exam code: midterm02n1N0
p: 16 students
r: 9 students
t: 5 students
v: 1 student
x: 0 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 7063), also sharing tangentially personal opinions on Star Wars:

Astronomy midterm question: new two-rule planet classification rules

Astronomy 210 Midterm 2, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

An astronomer at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, CO proposed an alternate scheme[*] for defining a planet, paraphrased here as:
Rule 1: Must be small enough that it is not a star.
Rule 2: Must also be large enough that it formed itself into a spherical shape.
Discuss one example of something in our solar system that is currently not a planet according to the International Astronomical Union that would now be considered a planet under this new two-rule scheme. Explain using both the International Astronomical Union classification scheme, and this new two-rule scheme.

[*] Mark W. Buie, "Definition of a Planet," boulder.swri.edu/~buie/pluto/planetdefn.html.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Correct. Selects a round object such as a dwarf planet (such a Ceres, or Pluto) or the moon that is not a planet (due to not dominating its orbit around the sun; or because it does not orbit the sun directly), and shows that these objects would be considered a planet under the new two-rule scheme, as they would be small enough to not be a star, and also be rounded in the shape.
  • r:
    Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors.
  • t:
    Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors.
  • v:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. Discussion only tangentially related to the IAU classification scheme.
  • x:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Discussion unrelated to the IAU classification scheme.
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Grading distribution:
Section 70158
Exam code: midterm02sP3c
p: 18 students
r: 4 students
t: 11 students
v: 0 students
x: 1 student
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 3695) discussing how a dwarf planet such as Pluto or Ceres would then be considered a planet:

A sample "p" response (from student 1022) discussing how the moon would then be considered a planet:

Astronomy midterm question: ranking distances given apparent magnitudes, absolute magnitudes

Astronomy 210 Midterm 2, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

The apparent magnitudes and absolute magnitudes of three stars are listed below.
m
apparent
magnitude
M
absolute
magnitude
Avior +1.9 –4.5
Benetnash +1.9 –3.0
Tau Ceti +3.5 +5.7

Determine which star is farthest away (or indicate a tie, if any). Explain using the relationships between apparent magnitude, absolute magnitude, and distance.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Correct. Understands difference between apparent magnitude m (brightness as seen from Earth, when placed at their actual distance from Earth) and absolute magnitude M (brightness as seen from Earth, when placed 10 parsecs away), and compares:
    1. how star A (Avior) and star B (Benetash) appear equally bright (same apparent magnitude m), but star A is brighter than star B when both are placed at 10 parsecs away from Earth (brighter absolute magnitude), thus star A had to be moved a greater distance closer to Earth than star B; and
    2. how star C (Tau Ceti) appears dimmer than star A and star B (dimmer apparent magnitude m), and when star C is moved further back to 10 parsecs away from Earth, it will be even dimmer than star A and star B at 10 parsecs (and thus star C is the closest of these three stars).
  • r:
    Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors. Discusses (1), but does not discuss (2).
  • t:
    Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors. At least discussion demonstrates understanding of relationships between apparent magnitudes, absolute magnitudes, and distances. May have order of brightnesses reversed, picking star C as having the brightest absolute magnitude.
  • v:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. At least attempts to use relationships between apparent magnitudes, absolute magnitudes, and distances.
  • x:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Discussion based on garbled definitions of, or not based on proper relationships between apparent magnitudes, absolute magnitudes,
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Section 70160
Exam code: midterm02sP3c
p: 27 students
r: 3 students
t: 9 students
v: 2 students
x: 0 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 1022):

Astronomy midterm question: ranking absolute magnitudes given apparent magnitudes, distances

Astronomy 210 Midterm 2, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

The apparent magnitudes and distances of three stars are listed below.
m
apparent
magnitude
d
distance
from Earth
Avior +1.9 190 pcs
Benetnash +1.9   32 pcs
Tau Ceti +3.5     4 pcs

Determine which star has the brightest absolute magnitude (or indicate a tie, if any). Explain using the relationships between apparent magnitude, absolute magnitude, and distance.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Correct. Understands difference between apparent magnitude m (brightness as seen from Earth, when placed at their actual distance from Earth) and absolute magnitude M (brightness as seen from Earth, when placed 10 parsecs away), and compares:
    1. how star A (Avior) and star B (Benetash) appear equally bright (same apparent magnitude m), but star A is brighter than star B when both are placed at 10 parsecs away from Earth (and thus has a brighter absolute magnitude), as star A will be moved a greater distance closer to Earth than star B; and
    2. how star C (Tau Ceti) appears dimmer than star A and star B (dimmer apparent magnitude m), and when star C is moved further back to 10 parsecs away from Earth, it will be even dimmer than star A and star B at 10 parsecs (and thus star C has the dimmest absolute magnitude of these three stars).
  • r:
    Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors. Discusses (1), but does not discuss (2).
  • t:
    Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors. At least discussion demonstrates understanding of relationships between apparent magnitudes, absolute magnitudes, and distances. May have order of brightnesses reversed, picking star C as having the brightest absolute magnitude.
  • v:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. At least attempts to use relationships between apparent magnitudes, absolute magnitudes, and distances.
  • x:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Discussion based on garbled definitions of, or not based on proper relationships between apparent magnitudes, absolute magnitudes,
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Section 70160
Exam code: midterm02n1N0
p: 18 students
r: 3 students
t: 5 students
v: 1 student
x: 0 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 3030):

A sample "p" response (from student 5555):

Astronomy midterm question: same luminosity, same size, different temperature stars?

Astronomy 210 Midterm 2, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

An astronomy question on an online discussion board[*] was asked and answered:
??: Can two stars with the same luminosity have the same size, but different temperatures?
Lodar: If the temperatures are different, the sizes would also have to be different for their luminosities to be the same.
Discuss why this answer is correct, and how you know this. Explain using Wien's law, the Stefan-Boltzmann law and/or an H-R diagram.

[*] answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20150810205550AAgBvqF.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Correct. Uses Wien's law, the Stefan-Boltzmann law and/or interprets H-R diagram to demonstrate how same luminosity stars with different temperatures would have to have different sizes. May also demonstrate that same luminosity stars with different temperatures cannot have the same temperatures.
  • r:
    Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors.
  • t:
    Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors. At least discussion demonstrates understanding of Wien's law, H-R diagram and/or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
  • v:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. At least attempts to use Wien's law, H-R diagram and/or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
  • x:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Discussion not clearly based on Wien's law, H-R diagram and/or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Section 70158
Exam code: midterm02sP3c
p: 34 students
r: 3 students
t: 1 student
v: 2 students
x: 1 student
y: 0 students
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 5635) discussing how same luminosity stars with different temperatures would have to have different sizes:

A sample "p" response (from student 1022), discussing how same luminosity stars with different temperatures cannot have the same temperatures:

Astronomy midterm question: hotter giant same size as cooler supergiant?

Astronomy 210 Midterm 2, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

An astronomy question on an online discussion board[*] was asked and answered:
??: Can a giant be the same size as a supergiant if the giant were hotter than the supergiant?
MirJ: No.
Discuss why this answer is correct, and how you know this. Explain using Wien's law, the Stefan-Boltzmann law and/or an H-R diagram.

[*] answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20151031174552AAVPVMx.

Solution and grading rubric:
  • p:
    Correct. Uses Wien's law, the Stefan-Boltzmann law and/or interprets H-R diagram to demonstrate how a supergiant and a giant with the same size is not possible if the giant is hotter by discussing either that:
    1. for a supergiant and giant with the same size, the supergiant must be hotter than the giant (thus the giant cannot be hotter than the supergiant);
    2. for a giant hotter than a supergiant of the same size, the giant would be more luminous than the supergiant (which is not possible, as all supergiants are more luminous than giants);
    3. for a giant hotter than a supergiant, the giant must be smaller than the supergiant (thus the giant cannot be the same size as the supergiant).
  • r:
    Nearly correct (explanation weak, unclear or only nearly complete); includes extraneous/tangential information; or has minor errors.
  • t:
    Contains right ideas, but discussion is unclear/incomplete or contains major errors. At least discussion demonstrates understanding of Wien's law, H-R diagram and/or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
  • v:
    Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner. At least attempts to use Wien's law, H-R diagram and/or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
  • x:
    Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit. Discussion not clearly based on Wien's law, H-R diagram and/or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
  • y:
    Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
  • z:
    Blank.
Section 70160
Exam code: midterm02n1N0
p: 18 students
r: 2 students
t: 1 student
v: 3 students
x: 6 students
y: 1 student
z: 0 students

A sample "p" response (from student 4321) discussing how a supergiant must be hotter than the giant of the same size (thus the giant cannot be hotter than the supergiant):

A sample "p" response (from student 6392) how giant that is hotter than a supergiant of the same size would be more luminous than the supergiant (which is not possible, as all supergiants are more luminous than giants):

A sample "p" response (from student 1996) how a giant hotter than a supergiant must be smaller than the supergiant (thus the giant cannot be the same size as the supergiant):

20151127

Astronomy current events question: oldest known Milky Way stars

Astronomy 210L, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Students are assigned to read online articles on current astronomy events, and take a short current events quiz during the first 10 minutes of lab. (This motivates students to show up promptly to lab, as the time cut-off for the quiz is strictly enforced!)
Charles Q. Choi, "These Ancient Stars May Be the Oldest Ever Seen in the Milky Way" (November 11, 2015)
space.com/31083-oldest-stars-milky-way-galaxy.html
The Australia National University's SkyMapper telescope discovered the oldest known stars in the Milky Way, based on their:
(A) lack of metals.
(B) erratic orbits.
(C) type II supernova explosions.
(D) gravitational redshifts.
(E) dark matter content.

Correct answer: (A)

Student responses
Sections 70178, 70186
(A) : 13 students
(B) : 1 student
(C) : 4 students
(D) : 3 students
(E) : 1 student

Astronomy current events question: discovery of dwarf planet V774104

Astronomy 210L, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Students are assigned to read online articles on current astronomy events, and take a short current events quiz during the first 10 minutes of lab. (This motivates students to show up promptly to lab, as the time cut-off for the quiz is strictly enforced!)
Geoff Brumfiel, "Astronomers Spot Most Distant Object So Far In The Solar System" (November 16, 2015)
npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/11/11/455643251/astronomers-spot-most-distant-object-in-the-solar-system
Dwarf planet V774104, the most distant solar system object discovered so far was detected by:
(A) gravitational lensing.
(B) gamma ray bursts.
(C) motion in photographs.
(D) reflected radio signals.
(E) gravitational forces on inner planets.

Correct answer: (C)

Student responses
Sections 70178, 70186
(A) : 1 students
(B) : 2 students
(C) : 14 students
(D) : 2 students
(E) : 1 students

Astronomy current events question: Phobos' surface egrooves

Astronomy 210L, fall semester 2015
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

Students are assigned to read online articles on current astronomy events, and take a short current events quiz during the first 10 minutes of lab. (This motivates students to show up promptly to lab, as the time cut-off for the quiz is strictly enforced!)
Elizabeth Zubritsky, "Mars’ Moon Phobos is Slowly Falling Apart" (November 10, 2015)
nasa.gov/feature/goddard/phobos-is-falling-apart
Computer models indicate that the grooves on Mars' moon Phobos may be produced by:
(A) solar heating.
(B) convection currents.
(C) cryovolcanoes.
(D) Mars' gravity.
(E) its rapid rotation.

Correct answer: (D)

Student responses
Sections 70178, 70186
(A) : 1 student
(B) : 3 students
(C) : 1 student
(D) : 15 students
(E) : 0 students