Physics 205B Final Exam, spring semester 2013
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
Cf. Giambattista/Richardson/Richardson,
Physics, 2/e, Problem 23.11, Comprehensive Problem 23.91

Light in Plexiglas® (index of refraction[*] of 1.491) is incident at an angle of 41.5° at the interface between Plexiglas® and air (index of refraction of 1.000). (Drawing is not to scale.) If the incident angle of the beam of light in Plexiglas® is increased slightly from 41.5° to 42.0°, describe what will happen to the beam. Explain your reasoning using the properties of light and refraction.
[*]
wiki.pe/Acrylic_glass.
Solution and grading rubric:
- p:
Correct. With an incident angle less than the critical angle, light
will still be transmitted out into air instead of totally internally reflected back into Plexiglas® (there will also be
a partially reflected ray in Plexiglas® as well). Directly calculates the critical angle to compare to the incident angle,
or attempts a (successful) trial solution for the transmitted angle in air using Snell's law.
- r:
As (p), but argument indirectly, weakly, or only by definition supports the statement to be proven, or has minor inconsistencies or loopholes.
- t:
Nearly correct, but argument has conceptual errors, or is incomplete.
- v:
Limited relevant discussion of supporting evidence of at least some merit, but in an inconsistent or unclear manner.
- x:
Implementation/application of ideas, but credit given for effort rather than merit.
- y:
Irrelevant discussion/effectively blank.
- z:
Blank.
Grading distribution:
Sections 30882
Exam code: finalpL3x
p: 19 students
r: 1 student
t: 5 students
v: 5 students
x: 0 students
y: 0 students
z: 0 students
A sample "p" response (from student 1408), first attempting a trial solution to Snell's law (which would indicate no total internal reflection):

Another sample "p" response (from student 6377), explicitly solving for the critical angle first, and then noting that the incident angle is smaller than the critical angle: