20181030

Physics quiz question: shooting a more massive foam dart

Physics 205A Quiz 6, fall semester 2016
Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA

"Nerf Recon CS-6"
Anima Kitty
flic.kr/p/4meXDZ

A 2008 NERF® N-Strike Recon CS-6 toy gun can be modeled as a compressed horizontal spring that is released to push against a standard 1.3×10–3 kg foam dart, which speeds up from rest to a final speed of 16 m/s.[*][**][***] Ignore drag/friction.

A slightly more massive dart launched from this same Recon CS-6 toy gun will have __________ final speed compared to the standard 1.3×10–3 kg dart.
(A) a slower.
(B) the same.
(C) a faster.
(D) (Not enough information given.)

[*] nerfhaven.com/forums/topic/23927-dart-mass-listing/
[**] nerfguns.net/mods/mod-kits/
[***] instructables.com/id/Streamline-Dart-Mod/

Correct answer (highlight to unhide): (B)

Starting with the energy balance equation:

Wnc = ∆KEtr + ∆PEgrav + ∆PEelas,

where Wnc = 0 (no external gains/losses of mechanical energy), and ∆PEgrav = 0 (as there is no change in elevation of the foam dart as it travels horizontally), such that:

0 = ∆KEtr + ∆PEelas,

0 = (1/2)·m·∆(v2) + (1/2)·k·∆(x2),

0 = (1/2)·m·(vf2v02) + (1/2)·k·(xf2x02).

With the initial parameters of v0 = 0 (starting from rest) and the final parameter xf = 0 (spring relaxed after releasing the foam dart), then:

0 = (1/2)·m·(vf2 – 02) + (1/2)·k·(02x02),

0 = (1/2)·m·vf2 – (1/2)·k·x02,

(1/2)·k·x02 = (1/2)·m·vf2,

(k·x02)/m = vf2,

and thus the final velocity of the foam dart is given by:

vf = x0·√(k/m).

Using a more massive foam dart in the same toy gun would increase m in the denominator of the square root quantity (while the spring constant k and the distance x0 that is spring is compressed from equilibrium would be unchanged), and thus this would result in a slower final speed compared to the original less massive foam dart.

Sections 70854, 70855, 73320
Exam code: quiz06rn3T
(A) : 44 students
(B) : 8 students
(C) : 4 students
(D) : 0 students

Success level: 79%
Discrimination index (Aubrecht & Aubrecht, 1983): 0.18

No comments: